Toyota suffers a Brand meltdown

Monday, March 8, 2010

Toyota suffers a Brand meltdown

In February 2010 the total number of vehicles recalled worldwide by Toyota crossed the 8 million mark. This caused serious damage to the company’s brand. Years of denying the problem, combined with a failure to respond promptly and effectively when forced to do so, has toppled the company from automotive brand leadership. The brand which was built on safety and quality has lost its core essence. The recalled vehicles had serious defects that put the lives of customers in danger.

Vehicle recalls

  • The first recall in September and November 2009 was for floor mats that could trap the pedal.
  • The second recall in January, 21, 2010 was for pedals that overtime become sticky, they were hard to depress or slow to pop up when not depressed.
  • On the 27th of January 2010 Toyota added 1.1 million vehicles to the original floor mat recall, the two recalls were mostly in the U.S.A and involved more than 6 million vehicles.
  • In early February 2010, the car maker announced a further recall of 437 000 vehicles worldwide for the Prius to repair brake problems. About 60 000 Toyota vehicles meant for export from South Africa were part of a recent recall.

Toyota was slow to respond to complaints

Although the first complaints emerged in 2004, Toyota only started reacting in late 2009. Initially Toyota was very dismissive to customers’ complaints. The company thought their vehicles were flawless. Since 2004 it has been very difficult to investigate Toyota because its systems are kept top secret. It always delayed on giving U.S government answers relating to vehicle safety. It took a fatal accident that killed four people in San Diego to jolt the company into action during September.

Rivals swoop in on Toyota’s territory
On top of the January recall Toyota suspended North American sales and production of eight models. This caused serious harm to its brand. Soon after thousands of the car makers customers approached rivals General Motors and Ford. This enticed the rivals to snatch the company’s customers. The rivals took advantage of this situation. General Motors offered Toyota Customers payouts of up to $1,000 or zero percent financing for up to five years if they traded in their Toyota for a GM vehicle. Soon after, Ford offered a similar deal. In addition Ford started buying keywords to ensure their ads pop up in the same locations, or right next to articles in online news sites covering the ongoing Toyota debacle.

Lesson to be learnt

Although slow to respond at first, Toyota has managed to get a couple of things right since the recalls have been announced.

Senior communicators have been Twittering and blogging like crazy to fill the information vacuum and take control of the escalating situation. Websites and call centres have been established with information for worried Toyota customers. And US Chief Operating Officer Jim Lentz talked directly to Toyota drivers in a video posted to YouTube.

The company’s use of social media in this way has enabled it to get its point of view across and reach its customers directly without the filter of the media to editorialise the message. However many is of the opinion that it might be too little too late.

Toyota was ranked the world’s eighth most valuable brand last year, in a study by Interbrand, beating Apple, Disney and Intel. Where will they be in the rankings this year? Only time will tell.

Digital Compliance, What you Need to Know

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Digital Compliance, What you Need to Know

Paul Jacobson from Jacobson Attorneys joins us this afternoon to help Demystify Digital Compliance.

Some of the interesting points from the presentation:

    Do you think that you have some control over your brand the thing with social media is that often companies don’t
  • Although people think that they have some control over their brand the thing with social media is that often companies don’t
  • Web is a very different kind of space – its all about being social and are constantly evolving
  • You want to get to a point where people care enough about what you are doing to tell their friends
  • Not just dealing with one person in isolation, you are now dealing with one person that has 400 friends on Facebook, 200 followers on Twitter and so the reach of one person is much more important
  • Traditional legal approach don’t really work when it comes to social media
  • Need to also think about Employees and how they are using social media
  • Manage your content licensing process – ensure you have the right license to enable sharing
  • Privacy Rights is going to be the biggest issue facing us online in the next couple of years

World Cup Secrets -Journal of Marketing

World Cup Secrets -Journal of Marketing

Ingrid Rubin features in the latest edition of the Journal of Marketing magazine. Get your hands on a copy to find out what guidelines she suggest for keeping your brand’s reputation on track in the digital world.

Ingrid Rubin featured in the latest edition of Journal of Marketing

Ingrid Rubin featured in the latest edition of Journal of Marketing

Demystifying Digital Compliance with Paul Jacobson

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Demystifying Digital Compliance with Paul Jacobson
Thursday, March 4, 2010
2:30 pm

Digital Compliance? We’ve all heard of it but do we actually know what this means?
The recent buzz around this topic in the media has probable left you with a lot of questions.
Don’t miss out on this opportunity to get crucial information from a leading expert on this topic.

Want to join us? Click here for more details

Engagement is Key in Reputation Management Strategies

Monday, February 22, 2010

Engagement is Key in Reputation Management Strategies

At the end of last year Econsultancy published some very interesting research in regards to methods used by Companies Worldwide to minimize the impact of online negative comments about their brand, products or services.  Some interesting stats:

  • 47% Directly engaged with publishers / blogger to rectify issues or address negative experience
  • 33% Attempted to improve products and services in order to reduce or eradicate negativity
  • 24% Encourage others to speak more positively about us
  • 17% Issues and distributed press releases or comments to address issue
  • 14% Attempted to get offending content removed by publishers/blogger
  • 12% Created content to push offending results down search engine rankings